Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28083312-20180131120656/@comment-32971195-20180219042151

The Tidal Wave wrote: Grudgeholderr wrote: DroneDestroyer wrote: The Tidal Wave wrote: GellyPop wrote: &gt; "anons+comments [seems like it would be] a nightmare" After thinking about for some reasons, even making strict policies (as strict as or much stricter than Blog Comments) if Article Comments are to be enabled is somewhat useless because of those anons that usually ain't reading our policies at all. Yeah, we should just disable anon editing altogether. Who's with me? Not me. The hassle of creating an account is too much for some and turning helpful edits away because of some bad edits that can be reverted in one click is wrong. Maybe article comments for editors only? Same. Some have already gotten used to the wiki, befriended other users, made conceptions, and helped out. It would be cruel to drive them all away again. True that. But since anons + comments is a supposed nightmare, I say we still enable users only for comments. Yep.