Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30300069-20160612063354/@comment-28752607-20160617040431

ZathusTheMageV wrote: LordScytheX wrote: Sorry to barge into your conversation, but I think people with over 100 edits should deserve to be an Administrator. This is counterable however. Just because someone makes 100 edits doesn't mean they're responsible. If we set this kind of goal, people would race and make minor edits just because there IS a reward for doing so. And while that works on some occasions (such as games), this is real life; where what happens and who's in charge and how they handle it truly matters...

...unless you meant, it should be required for only current nomination, in which case, the above paragraph still stands strong with some of its points. As for now, we do not have any Administrators, except for the guy who made 7 edits before being inactive. I suggest 100 edits is acceptable for now.