Thread:Banarama/@comment-31513065-20191007033317/@comment-26806340-20191007133159

I usually don't want to bring any off-wiki threads to this wiki, but since you're already here I'll just share my thoughts real quick.

Don't give him admin. Whatever you do, don't. He appears to be a pretty mediocre editor who mostly just comments, and doesn't really have any significant skills that stand out as you said. Admin really isn't necessary for him. Plus, his counterargument on the court thread seems pretty weak and is mostly "X's arguments are wrong". An Admin should be a user with significant experience and contribution to the community whose skills and interpersonal maturity make it almost indisputable that they deserve the right, not someone who's been here for two months and needs a whole trial to make his case.

Just ask yourself this: what do you think he would be able to do if he were admin that he has the need for and doesn't have already? I think the content moderator that you gave him is more than enough and should satisfy most of the rights without making as much impact as Admin. But don't hesitate to take away it if he neglects his privileges as a Content Mod.

Overall, my thoughts are that this user is in no way up to par with the previous admins and almost certainly won't do much good with the privileges, not to mention admins should be well respected by the community. He should not be given admin, and if he continues to pester the leaders then consequences should be made.