Thread:Banarama/@comment-28083312-20170506031453

Are we breaking rule #1 of Administrating by talking to SFU? Should we just take his knowledge & then write the history? Ignoring him afterward? His blog, while it jogged some of my memory, is basically a giant, regurgitated hit-piece of points that stopped being relevant months ago. Should we just give him the rifleman treatment? (minus the block ofc) 