Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28083312-20180131120656/@comment-24764043-20180201021403

I'm glad you took the time to figure it out, considering I brought it up earlier as more of a question if it was possible. I'd like to see what people think, but seeing as Fanon pages comprise over 2000, then it would still be a daunting task more than enabling Article Comments on mainspace/Arras pages. I'm aware that the disabling on them are for the good presentability more than the actual task it would take.

So if people/staff are not in favor of doing the entirety of Fanon because of the moderation it could potentially take, I would like to see it on at least Tale of Diep pages, since I would love the feedback and criticisms both negative and positive they receive to be both easily accessible and because they give life to and show the support good pages get just as much as a Tournament won medal could (this would be biased as a raised point on just one namespace dedicated to the work of a few users, so this shouldn't be fully considered in just the ToD argument but the Fanon one as a whole). It also wouldn't be nearly as much to moderate, as it would be one relatively small namespace where even just the handful of people who have staff rights working on it (like Grav and I) could probably cover it, though of course if anyone did WANT to help they could.

'''I am all for Fanon as a whole getting comments, but the above paragraph is more just an explanation to at least ToD getting them for the time being, should people not WANT all of Fanon to have them in the first place. It was not a pretentious view of the namespace being any more important than Fanon. Though I feel no matter the outcome, so long as any pages get Article Comments, a series of comment regulations would have to be made. These would not be intense, and more just ward off bad grammar, spam, linking to external websites, etc.'''

I'd like to see what others have to say.