Board Thread:Petitions/@comment-28083312-20170822225125/@comment-28083312-20170823015704

Utkar22 wrote: What did staff say regarding this? I have been in contact with ever since I proposed it a week or two ago, I just got word back that this is doable & that is why the vote is happening. TheGoldenPatrik1 wrote: Are there going to be separate descriptions/requsities/appliactions/etc. for code admins? Yes, but chances are high that Code Admin rights will be invitation-only. The full details are yet to be decided, but proficiency in either JS, CSS, or Lua would likely be necessary, however there might be a few rare exceptions where bot operators or users who are extremely skilled at PI XML & Parser Functions might also be accepted. The activity requirement would be much lower in comparison to Community-oriented Staff. Graviatar wrote: As a discussion moderator I don't really look at discussions very much, and I'm not adept in coding. However I still want to help out with moderation yet I don't know the right place. I could just say I'm a moderator of the conception side of the wiki and help out with art-based projects occasionally. I just don't feel like I have a place here staff-wise yet, and I still want to help out as much as I can. If you used the Conceptions Category in Discussions then you might be able to foster a presence of Conceptors there, thus inclining you to moderate it. Or you might just be ideal as a Sentinel, but one thing you could do is make small (25x25 or smaller) transparent (they’d be transposed over differently colored backgrounds) icons of Dominator, Mothership, Guardian, Defender, & AC tanks for Project:Staff, as we want to change the way we signify activity & rank beyond simple colored text. That’d be an excellent contribution to this effort.