Thread:Ursuul/@comment-29771477-20170505231126/@comment-28083312-20170506015948

Yes, he came to give his account. He provided screenshots, although some of them (namely the Community Central ones) are not reliable because he obscured them, & what he didn’t obscure could be applied to any rogue Wiki ever. In fact they may even be deleted, because obscured images are not reliable & could even be modified. While he did provide speculations & accusations in plenty, only some of it was accurate. Nonetheless we will use what he has recounted in the history project. I’ll pick through his blog & separate what is undeniable fact from what is speculation, insults, & self-aggrandizement below: To begin with, I used to have a custom title. Existence of my title has been approved by Zathus. It lived in peace only for a few days and then it never saw the peace again. ✅ He was given a title by Zathus, acting as the leader of this Wiki. What is not mentioned is that the title was unique to this Wiki & hosted by it. It will likely be included in the history. Ursuul started coming up with new conditions for my title, he decided that my title is bound to be written in the list of titles with an explanation otherwise it has no right to exist. I did not like that. Just because. I did not create conditions for his title. For one, some conditions already existed as the title was hosted by the Wiki administration at the time. For another, the Senior Council voted to incorporate that title into a group of titles that eventually became the Medals. This they had the authority to do because the Medal was hosted by them, the administration, & was done democratically since the members were elected from among their peers on Staff, who were all elected by normal users. The only thing I did was enforce their ruling. So the ridiculousness took its beginning from here, of course there were other unlisted custom titles which existed on their own (generally on profiles of staff members), there was absolutely no need to disturb my title either. Moreover, let's be straight, why on earth a title would require a list? Why does it need it? Is there such a law in physics or perhaps the constitution of Japan declared such requirements for my title? How about you stop playing stupid games and leave my title alone? There were other arbitrary titles at the time (they were really just random tags, not really titles), but they were not official like SFU’s title & they were soon discontinued. There was a need to “disturb” his title because that’s what the Council voted on, I was simply the means by which their will was executed. As for “why it requires a lit?” It required it because that’s what the Council decided. You can see that decision here. I was given a title with no "but"s, there wasn't a word given about any new conditions coming. I asked ursuul to quit playing games but he did not. Despite the fact that I was one of the most useful contributors of the wikia, despite I was writing his name from a capital letter, ursuul has decided that his silly game is more important than my existence. ✅ No word there was of new conditions, but no promises there were that it wouldn’t be touched in the future. He did ask me to “stop playing games” (which actually took the form of numerous debates in private messaging), & I told him that the Council wasn’t a game. I wasn’t an autocrat, I served the Council & abided by its rules at that time. He was asking me to overturn their ruling, & through the course of those debates I repeatedly told him no. The part that is struckthrough is pure fluff & will be discarded. Note: I have transcripts of all non-useless conversations. Unlike ursuul, who enjoyed spreading lame gossips about me, I never gave away anything that has been told to me with trust. Although I have things that he would not want me to show to certain people, I'm not going to fall so low to use trust as a weapon ✅ Just came by to shit on your grave thread Ursuul said that the responsibility for what happened lies with him but he feels no remorse for anything. He wrote that the wikia's "council" is going to decide whether anyone is going to get any punishment (means that the case would be reviewed who knows when), and the trick was in the fact that each member of the "council" was SMG's friend, plus she was a part of council herself. In general that meant "No one is going to do anything about that, even if it wasn't okay to abuse you, I feel no remorse for it because I don't like you". That's how things were "fair" while ursuul was telling fairytales about constitution. ✅ I took responsibility for that as it was my fault. It was decided after all was said & done that SM’s ban, which was given without reason as Zathus admitted to later, would serve as appropriate punishment for that infraction. The part that is struck out is false however, because the Council was fully considered to be an impartial force at the time. Especially since something did happen to SM; she was banned. So there was this suicidal thread. Later ursuul stated that he requested an IP check and it showed that the IP of its creator belonged to SMG.



Ursuul pretended that he banned SMG and then organized a "stuff purge" due to which many users were demoted from staff.

I temporary returned to the wikia since the new admins were okay with my title and decided to let it exist on its own.

Soon I've figured out that ursuul is playing another game. The person who was "banned" turned out to be present on a secret account (Seismela) and had some quite big ruling powers. Ursuul refused to explain the situation and even threatened to ban me if I ever wrote anything on his wall again. ✅ This is one of those instances where I made grave mistakes, where I lied, & I regret it. I lied about the IP Check in an attempt to lure Rifleman into a range ban, by making him think I was deceived, because I wanted to hit him but not too many other people (which is what usually happens with range bans). Needless to say it was one of the stupidest mistakes I’ve ever made, & I have worked tirelessly to make up for it. The threat to SFU was wrong too, & I apologized for it. (Perhaps he could say something like "I don't want to see you on my wall, don't dare to come there again" and still, would he have a right to tell me that after he has been "terrorizing" me on my wall by restoring comments that I attempted to remove? I've lost the count how many times he restored removed comments on my wall). I have to note, this was the only case when ursuul took his worlds back, months later he said that the ban threat was too much. But still, I believe there is no faith behind it, he took back his words only after he realized that wikia users are not going to forget about this case. Of course, ursuul cares about having a clean faith in the eyes of public).  Beyond restoring threads on his wall, this is almost entirely baseless, personal attacks based on presumption. It will be discarded. I tried to discuss my discoverings regarding ursuul's game with community but Seismela (SMG) removed all of my posts. Then I decided to contact Zathus and report all suspicious things to him, I did not talk much, generally I provided a ton of links to various places to let him see what's going on by his own. As a result the "No More Games!" thread appeared, which was a temporary glipse at the bright future.

✅ The part about the No More Games thread is accurate, as well as his reporting. Some threads were removed by Sm, but I cannot recall what they were because I wasn’t the one doing it. More screenshots (& links) would be appreciated. But soon Zathus changed his mind. Opposing side told him a story of their absurd plan to lure out some rifleman (who is no more than a little hooligan with loads of underground accounts).

This is they stroy that they told:

✅ Do I even need to explain how insanely stupid that story was?

1) Why would ursuul even care about some alt accounts, were they worth a chaos and staff purge? When you find rats in the basement, do you burn down the whole house? Because I was stupid, & because I thought Rifleman more of a threat than he was.

2) Track IP range? This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard so far.

3) When I received a suicidal message, ursuul has warned this unknown abuser about an upcoming IP test. If it was rifleman there, then he would surely understand that his IP has nothing to do with an IP of the person who has been banned instead. So what was the reason to ban SMG? To make rifleman think that his IP mysteriously matched with an IP of SMG and that IP test itself was made by some sick idiots? Just wtf? My brain hurts to think further. What is the logic here? What exactly was supposed to trick rifleman? Where is the sense? ✅ The reason why I banned Sm was to make Rifleman think that, by some sheer stroke of luck, he shared an IP with Sm & that it fooled me into thinking Sm had betrayed us. By my banning Sm, Rifleman saw that I missed my target by a wide margin & banned the wrong person, meaning he was free of suspicion, & would be more likely to come in the ensuing havoc, allowing me to catch him. Unfortunately he didn’t show up until much later, after the first purge was over.

Despite that everything written above was a complete absurd, Zathus decided to believe it. Why? Just because.

✅

Zathus stated that both sides have been untrustworthy while he picked one of the sides. I was called untrustworthy because the opposing side had nothing more than a silly story and hollow words which Zathus chose to believe. Zathus did not “pick sides,” he simply didn’t do exactly what SFU wanted him to do. Nor was SFU called untrustworthy randomly; SFU was called untrustworthy because of his penchant for attacking people & for considering only his own point of view. That is why SFU carries the reputation he does, but that will not be recorded in the history project. It was later revealed that Zathus changed his mind long before he announced it officially, (probably because he was feeling very uncomfortable about the situation). Important: you can notice a game of words in the lines "SFU brought up a lot of past violations that were not given consequences" and "she has still broken many rules". This shows that at that time Zathus already refused to believe that SMG was KBOT and thus he gave her a ban for other violations. Zathus never stated that she was banned because she is accused of being KBOT. He still banned her. Zathus did state that, but he retracted his statements later when he reevaluated the situation. His statement will be recorded, but unless said rules can be brought to light, said statement will be regarded as hearsay.

There was a clear contradiction in what Zathus said before and later. This clearly shows that Zathus was not responsible for his own words. Meanwhile I was left to break my head trying to understand his position regarding this matter. At first he told that there WAS a reason for a ban, then the ban was shortened, then it was removed completely and I was accused of being unreasonable. Zathus did something called changing his mind, which is not synonymous with not being responsible for one’s words. In addition, since SFU obscured the image, it will be completely discarded. To be fair, no one will ever know whether KBOT was SMG or not. Zathus won't know. I won't know either. Nobody will. But I highly suspect that KBOT was SMG. Chances are high. Any adecvate person would agree that the story told by the opposing side makes no sense. They should have came up with a better story, the nonsense they told only made thing more suspicious. (It's clear that ursuul and SMG are friends, how about a variant that she has committed a crime but in the end ursuul's "heart melted" and he decided to side her? Doesn't such story have a higher possibility?). As for the content of this, my heart did melt & I did try to help her rejoin the Wiki with Seismela, because I used her as a scapegoat & that was wrong. I don't care about the ban itself, things that I'm writting now are an example of Zathus' complete irresponsibility. I do not care whether SMG is banned, her existence makes absolutely no difference to me. From that point I began defending the truth from Zathus who preteneded not to pick sides and who clearly contradicted himself. So Zathus wrote about a such thing as being humane, but what we are going to see next proves that I did not get any of that "humane". There was no support in anything so far. Next attack towards my title occured. As SMG was unbanned, a person named Krovopiyca (previously known as Tiriltiriladi) came over. This person used a password of one of ursuul's side accounts (Ozun Oldun) to promote herself/himself straight to bureaucrat. Ursuul stated that Krovopiyca is his sister, but there is strong possibility that this person is ursuul or SMG in disguise. There are countless reasons. Besides having a mixture of ursuul's and SMG's behaviour and sticking to same stories, there is a row of alarmingly suspicious tracks that this person left. At first we will look through Krovopiyca's "criminal" activity and then we will get back to the foolish tracks that this person left. I never gave the password of Özün Oldun to anyone. I personally used Özün Oldun to promote Krovopïyca to Bureaucrat after I told everyone that I would name a successor Bureaucrat. This was completely out in the open from the beginning, even mentioned in my infamous resignation letter. So what Krovopiyca has done: Krovopiyca has committed enough violations for demotion and deserved a strike but Zathus stubbornly protected her/him by all means. It was either because Zathus wanted ursuul to get back to the wikia and thus decided to act like a mr. kindness, or perhaps Krovopiyca was ursuul and Zathus knew it. More into details about Zathus' stubborn protection: Krovopiyca secretly and unfairly gained the bureaucratic rights while Zathus gave absolutely no reaction to it, then Krovopiyca proceeded to delete my legendary title. I saw that my title disappeared and I was certain that this was done by Krovopiyca and I came to Zathus to make things clear, I told him that this bureaucrat is another corrupt power abuser. Besides, Zathus stated that he would demote Krovopiyca if she/he abused power.

Zathus, as far as I know, liked Krovopïyca because she was interested mainly in being helpful, which Anson & Zathus can attest to (in fact I will ask Zathus for clarification because I don’t remember all that she did). As for the accusation that Krovopïyca deserved a strike or demotion because she committed violations, that is 100% falsehood. I personally promoted her as my successor, as was my right as Bureaucrat, & she took up the mantle responsibly. Nothing she did broke any rule, & in point of fact, Krovopïyca actually restored SFU’s Medal upon Zathus’ request. There are edit histories to prove it too. Krovopiyca abused power. Zathus did nothing. My title has been silently removed. And when I came to talk to Zathus, he responded to the title removal in a completely one-sided manner: "What you call corruption is just people making actions based on what they want".



That was probably the stupidest answer that I ever heard from him. He kept justifying Krovopiyca in everything. So if someone is going to abuse their power and attack you, if you come to Zathus for help, then he will tell you that they are allowed to do whatever they please just because they have power to. Everything looks quite like that. These assertions are predicated on the fact that Krovopïyca abused her power. Since she verifiably did not, this will be discarded. I've asked Zathus more than once to at least to admit that Krovopiyca was the one who deleted my title but he did not want to. He protected Krovopiyca by all means. Krovopiyca was the one who removed my title indeed, it was later confirmed by other staff members.So Zathus stated that I can have my title back. I got it back.



But then Krovopiyca vandalized it by adding question marks.



Yea, this one wasn't a big crime, but that action was an "evil sign" of how Krovopiyca did not care about any punishment, here rules corruption and the law is only for servants, not for the rulers. Zathus seemed to be okay with this. As I said, she was the one who re-added it at Zathus’ request, as can be seen in that link. However she made a mistake, & didn’t restore the actual Tag itself, just the assignation. What this causes the UserTags script to do is produce those question marks around the Tag, since it has nothing to go off of. She quickly fixed it too, as can be seen here. Lastly, there was a quite big protest against this unwelcome bureaucrat. Zathus stated that Krovopiyca deserves a chance and refused to demote him/her. Speaking about chances, Zathus gave me a "chance" to become a bureaucrat as well (but in my case, my chance was more of a joke).

✅ There was a petition to demote Krovopïyca, but it ended in a roughly even 50/50 split (both in the poll & in the comments), which is why Zathus insisted on keeping her. Since there wasn’t a clear majority voting for her demotion, Zathus couldn’t have demoted her even if he wanted to. SFU is also correct in that he was considered for an Administrative & Bureaucratic position. Certain users caused massive disturbance on the voting thread and abused their power by closing threads where I was talking only to Zathus. Zathus sided Krovopiyca by all possible means and I was not given a slightest support. Zathus never said a single word about horrible behaviour of certain users and all of them got away with their crimes.

✅ SuperAnson was a moderator, & he deemed SFU’s continual pestering of Zathus (& it was continual) to be drama. Zathus was free to reopen the thread if he thought otherwise, but since he did not, then Anson was fully within his rights as a duly appointed moderator to stop the conversations from escalating beyond proper proportion, something that happened far too often in those days. In point of fact, the closure of that thread was the cessation of disturbance, not the other way around. Nevertheless, this fact will be considered “contested” in the History Project, & we will not definitively state that Anson was in the right, nor that he was in the wrong. Was I ever treated equally? No. However, this tale will still be told. Before the Shadow Editor title was even made, he wanted it to be a unique title only for himself. Time & again we told him no, & even in granting him a title we cautioned him that it comes from us, the administration, & by extension the community. When the Senior Council decided that his Tag could not be unique, because it was unequal to everyone else. He labelled their decision unfair, & demanded that I overturn the Council’s ruling. Needless to say, I refused. Why? Because what he describes as unfairness actually was fairness. Even to this day he demands that his SE title be unique, asking that it be the only Tag not documented, because it would be “unfair” for his title to be like everyone else’s. What he describes as fairness is actually favoritism & special pleading. Now, because our views on fairness are so radically different, this will not be included. What will be included is that the treatment of SFU is contested. '''Everyone has been told lies. Now, why Krovopiyca = ursuul/SMG:'''

As the picture shows, Krovopiyca/Tiriltiriladi and Seismela (SMG) made a same message on the same wall. Different people don't create accounts on the same date and then write exactly the same thing in the same place at the same time. Moreoever, pay attention to Krovopiyca's date of birth. SMG used to make alt accounts with a date of birth similar to the one on her real account. So the date on SMG's profile is April 2, Krovopiyca - April 3 and Seismela - April 4. This is a real pattern. It would be hysterically funny if someone tried to deny the truth now. There are 365 days in the year, what are chances to get a row of such numbers by a coincidence? I know, personally, that Krovopïyca is not Sm. Her birthday is actually January 4th, & SM’s is April 2nd. As far as I know, Sm probably chose April 4th to be close to her real date, & Krovopïyca most likely chose hers randomly. However, since I cannot prove their identity, & neither can SFU (not beyond a shadow of a doubt), this will not be entered into the History. Instead, we will note that her identity is contested, but no more, because saying anything else would cause one party to see the history as inaccurate. The ruling force here sees no price in you, its ego is above everything. They'll tell you that you are treated equally while they trash your dignity, they'll feed you lies because you are not worth their simple honesty, they'll play dirty in their own games and commit crimes under disguise, they will be foolish enough to leave tracks and patterns behind them and then they'll tell you to believe in 1/365 coincidences. I'm pretty sure that Krovopiyca was an account shared by both ursuul and SMG (or it was at least one of them). Don't rush to tell me what you think about it, I don't need to know if you choose to believe in some silly coincidence. Even if by some miracle it was not ursuul or SMG (or both), we can say with 100% certanity that ursuul was giving all directives to that person anyway. If it was ursuul's sister then why wouldn't she follow his will? Wouldn't he simply tell "her" what to do? Guess what, just as ursuul returned, his "sister" Krovopiyca left the wikia. As ursuul came back, Zathus wrote an apology regarding the "No More Games!" thread and ursuul turned this wikia into a complete monarchy. Of course, my title suffered from more attacks. Third and fourth attack occured. To be exact, at first ursuul "vandalized" the title and then removed it completely. As for the “vandalism,” that was to signify that you had left. Since you had, going completely inactive, the title was forfeit. As for me commanding Krovopïyca; that is partially true. I showed her the ropes, & told her what the best practices were. Nevertheless, none of it will be recorded into the history because SFU considers my account to be false, yet his own narrative is unsupported speculation, so it will all be thrown out. To sum up, this is the short story of my title:

1) I never signed any contracts about accepting new conditions for my title in the future, my title never belonged to any list. Morever, there were other "lonely" titles besides mine, no one even cared about "formalizing" them. That was no more than some silly game that ursuul decided to play with my title.  True SFU did not sign a contract, but that is irrelevant because the title came from the administration, which was an extension of the community. Community giveth, community taketh away. It’s completely false that I was playing games; that was the Senior Council’s ruling, I simply enforced said ruling. It was the law of the Wiki while it lasted, & though SFU to this day never acknowledged it, considering it to be a “game,” it didn’t matter. Its dictates were enforced anyway. That will be recorded in the history, because we have undeniable evidence of this fact. 2) Those title lists have been destroyed during the "staff purge", new admins agreed that my title may exist on its own. I-double-did-not-sign-any-contracts-about-upcoming-conditions.

3) After all, when title lists were destroyed, Zathus stated once again that I CAN have my title.

4) After Krovopiyca "attacked" my title twice (probably under ursuul's command), this title began to symbolize the state that the wikia is in. Krovopiyca clearly showed that he/she does not care about anything nor fears of any punishment. No title - corruption rules.

5) I got it back after Krovopiyca's attacks, then ursuul returned to the wikia and decided to mess up my title for a zillionth time. At first he "vandalized" it but then remembered about the old "game" he was playing...

6) ...and removed it completely again.

7) He was not done yet. Ursuul came up with an idea of user rewards. Each title was given a picture. Due to the rules of his "game", despite my title was removed from my profile, it still belonged to me, and I was supposed to have a badge for it. So he gave me a badge. A picture of a g*y flag. He knew that I would heavily dislike it. He chose a such picture in order to make it look like I say that "I don't want it" and to have a reason to erase all tracks of my title from my profile once and forever.  The SE title will be mentioned, briefly, but it was not central to the Dark Era. It will only be mentioned along with the other titles, & the drama it caused, but the history of the SE title is unimportant in the grand scheme of things. That's how much attacks my title has suffered. From this you can be certain that my title is gone because of ursuul's personal wish in its all beauty.

I never refused from my title, I just did not accept nonsensical and disgusting conditions which popped up later.

Of course ursuul wants to be loved and he won't admit that the reason I don't have my title is just because of his disrespect, unthankfulness and egoism. But he does't need to admit it, it's all perfectly clear.

So the only thing that I had left to do it to ask Zathus to fix the situation by his own (actually Zathus once told that my title can be the way I want it to).

This was my last attempt to get my title back. On my last days I asked Zathus to fix this. Let's be fair, Zathus is still a boss here and it's clear that if he ever wanted, he would simply tell ursuul to leave my title alone in peace. He was talking about being humane in past, right? Well, I've asked Zathus for support. So, any results? No. No title. No nothing. Zathus did nothing.

For a conclusion about Zathus, I won't say that Zathus is a source of corruption, I'm being straight and honest, he was not the one who tried to hurt me, problem is that he did not fix anything nor he ever supported me equally or fairly. The lack of support is not a surprise for me after all. I understand that he dislikes me and it's not his responsibility to like me, but NO NEED TO TELL LIES about no side picking.

I have flawlessly uncovered this wikia's corruption. Of course that's far not everything I have to say, this writing can go on forever but I guess it's enough. Everything that has been written here is truth. Nothing can be proved wrong. There are screenshots for everything, they show the reality, the show the undeniable truth. Representatives of corruption will continue wearing official and clever masks and will continue typing lies in official texts but they will never escape from their past. And the present remains the same. Behind the mask there is the same disrespectful, unthankful, double-faced egoist who is very trollish and immature together with a place that he rules. "Very trollish and immature" - words by Community Central itself, which has way more sanity and power to stop humiliation. This is where I'm going whenever I feel a need. Actually, after ursuul gave me a g*y flag, it started to seem like he wants to continue his "attacks", so I went to the Community Central to make sure that I'm going to receive support, I had a conversation with one of their emplyees. I'd rather not get into details about my conversations with Community Central, I'm not showing what I have. The maximum I can show is a few blurred screenshots, just if anyone is curious, no more than that. To be short, as I contacted Community Central, I gave them a few links and screenshots and asked them about their opinion (to be exact, I showed some stuff exactly about ursuul). The Community Central turned out to be fully sane and understanding. They agreed that this wikia is messed up and has violated Terms of Use. I was able to bring a ground breaking judgement to this place. Since there was a lot of mess to dig up, they asked me to help them in the process.



Luckily, ursuul removed the g*y flag on time and I decided to leave it all.

I'm not an "attacker", I'm a "defender".

But I will keep all screenshots, links and transcripts with me, the Community Central will be my best method of defence which I'm going to use whenever I feel disturbed.

Worth to note twice, Community Central stated that something is definitely wrong here and called the wikia by "trollish and immature". That's what this place gets. This is where Zathus led this place to and how ursuul rules here. SFU has never edited once on Community Central. Even if he had, perhaps with an alternate account, the evidence he gives us is too weak. The screenshots are so obscured that only small bits can be discerned. Such things have been said about many Wikis many times before, so unless concrete evidence (unobscured screanshots) & a link to the Community Central discussion is provided, it will be discarded. Perhaps someone would ask: "Why in the beginning you decided to leave the wikia because you couldn't have a title, but once you got it back you decided to go through all this mess?"

Actually, it wasn't exactly the title I was protecting, I was protecting the truth. The title itself was no more than two words on a screen. Corruption decided to take away my title, this unfair act gave me a chance to uncover everything and so I began the chase. I wasn't chasing after the title. I was chasing after corruption. I've chased it down. I found the truth. I showed it to you. The title was a good bait for snakes. They are all exposed to the light. Now you know everything. What you choose to believe in?

You can choose to live in hell, I withhold myself to sell.

What is this place? This is a monarchy of someone who does whatever he pleases. You can find pressure everywhere, this is a place where each guest is given a title of a newbie (nooby) in order to make the ruling force feel high among the low servants who are bound to fulfill each single rule of nonsense and face restrictions wherever they step. For example, you are told not to comment on old threads. What's wrong? The internet is running out of space or what? Dare to comment on old threads and you will be banned because you are a "criminal" who violated somebody's wish to show off with their power over you in every way possible. A barely populated wikia with restrictions and chains everywhere. Puppets instead of a community where everyone would be given a fair value. A dollhouse where everyone is dancing to satisfy the king's pride and power.

Maybe you think that you are not a puppet in here? Can you do anything? Will you ever do more than write a petition (which will be denied)? If you are a protester then you are so low against the king that you are not even allowed to talk to him on the same level, you need to submit a petition as if you are talking to the whole government. His "highness" won't give much value to you.

Would you dare to protect your own dignity and go against the "king"? Where will you end up if you don't play this game how the king wants you to play? What will happen to you if you don't let the king enjoy his power over you? What will happen if the king doesn't like you? Will they ever treat you fairly? All answers in my story.

Nah, there is nothing humane. There is no respect. There is no justice. There is no truth. There are selfishness, pride, corruption and lies.

This wikia is corrupt forever. Nothing has changed or will change. The absence of my title symbolizes that the corruption rules here. To be fair, I totally deserved that title. No title - unfair.

No matter how much time passes, no matter what they say, no matter what masks they use to cover their faces, be certain that the real face of this place is right here on screenshots. There. Took a while, but I’ve salvaged what I could. With this information, we can safely incorporate SFU’s knowledge into the History Project. Refer back to this for data.