Thread:GellyPop/@comment-28083312-20171031154728/@comment-29771477-20171110212651

Ursuul wrote: I think we can mention him very briefly, but remember he was a very controversial figure so bias is an issue. If we say “he came, harassed people & threw the Wikia into chaos,” then while that might be 90% accurate, you’re going to have opposing parties disagreeing with that statement. You could instead say that “his return heralded a few troubling weeks for the community,” which basically means that “shit went down after he arrived”. Doesn’t directly blame him for anything but is still historically accurate.

That's why I think someone trusted and good at being unbiased (Bana? Me?) should make that section. Honestly I'm not too worried about it, because if people are still getting mad about that just tell them that that's ridiculous and be done with it *shrug*.