Board Thread:Fanon/@comment-30011843-20171227141304/@comment-28083312-20171228044432

It really already is. It’s still considered Fanon even though it’s a “separate namespace,” ToD just has a special label. I think the problem is deeper than simply what namespace it’s in.

If it was a game actually in development, it’d make sense as a whole new area that partially lifts off from the Diep feel as a “sequel” of sorts, similar to how Diep2 breaks new ground from the original (just toned up several notches). But since, whether in a separate namespace or not, it’s still “Diep.io Fanon” then it’s expected that it be pretty heavily anchored to Diep.io itself.

This, I think, was an issue in as it is an issue here & will continue to be a point of friction until it either gets back in touch with its roots content-wise, or becomes a legitimate game in its own right.