Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28083312-20180131120656/@comment-30123468-20180131134744

While article comments exist: Despite there are very few good comments, useless ones and rather spams outnumber them in a way that if a viewer tries to read the whole page from top to bottom, they will see how immature are most of those "commentators" who, during that time, are all having accounts, so they know them.. It is only to hope that the comment section will not load for the viewer so that they cannot see the garbage (which often happens with low data connection).

Because of the statements above, article comments in our wiki has received a bad reputation. That was just before the Great Merge, so there are only a hundred plus pages back then. Now that concepts are now present here (and perhaps add a few Arras-based pages), more than 2000 pages need to be moderated back & forth.

You may think the WikiActivity page help the Staff to see whether irrelevant/off-topic comments were created, but it is not the problem. Not every Staff can be active at all times to moderate them. They're humans, too, and so they take breaks or rests if they need to. I would not point out about the number of Staff numbers before and now, since each rights are different from what they used to be.