Board Thread:Petitions/@comment-28083312-20170822225125/@comment-29771477-20170823162052

First thought: Okay, this makes perfect sense.

Second, current thought, now that I've tried and failed to make sense of the hierarchy and read all of the comments: ''???? Wait, what??? ????''

You say you can easily explain specific elements of things, so I trust you, Ursuul.

1) "Moderators" does not make sense to me, in the hierarchy. You totally confused my brain with that....just, what?

Senior Moderators = Content moderators now, right?

But after all this and the Tribunal (I support), content moderators won't exist (or be the same, anyways) because rollbacks will be code peeps and people who are code peeps and "leader admins" will be better than only leader admins? As in higher up? I think I have this all correct so far.

But then this is where I get confused: in your explanation it's not really clear to me the difference between the new moderators and the sentinels. Especially in the line:

"...the Chat Moderator group, & it would become our Sentinels all-in-one"

...because you never said Junior/Discussions moderators wouldn't have any change done to them, besides losing rollback rights? Maybe? You see my confusion here?

Will it be:

a) Junior (Discussion) moderator = Leader admin

or

b) Junior moderator<Leader admin

or

c) Junior moderator completely reworked, new moderator description = ?????

??????

TL;DR: I'm dumb, re-explain the bottom half of the new staff system with way more detail, please. Maybe I'm just stupid, sorry if I missed something and this is a really annoying comment.

2) ??????? (again) @ Banana's names

Why the heck would you name Community Administrators "CORRUPT Leaders" ???????

But, even though I don't understand the bottom half re-work, this doesn't really have to do with me much anyways. I can maybe even become a Sentinel again with more ease after this. So, I vote to support this. Separating staff with great coding skills from staff who have great social skills is a brilliant idea.