Thread:Coolestpip/@comment-32971195-20180329034345/@comment-31526087-20180330000107

Why I am not putting my opinions in the discussion:

Discussing the voting most likely would result in me having to explain why I pick one over the other, or enter a discussion with others about this when I do not want to talk about this. I just want to put my "vote" and leave. Along with that, I do not (And most likely cannot) want to change others opinions on this. I am "voting" for who I believe would be better suited for the Senior Administrator role, and that is it. I have no interest in trying to convince others in any way to pick the same person, because if they pick it due to me, then there is an issue. Plus others with way more influence are discussing it, a nobody is not going to change anything or anyone's opinions.

Tallying "issues":

With the matter of making it harder to tally votes, it is fairly simple to check the votes and who can and cannot vote. If there was a hundred or more people voting, or just one admin checking the votes, I could understand having extra people voting being an issue. But when it is not even over 30, a group of Admins should find it easy to check, even easier considering that most of the people voting are known by said admins and do not need to be checked if they are valid or not.

Questioning the point of this:

I also want to know why one of the invalid voters has not been messaged about this, or why it was even needed. Anyone who reads the voting rules (Which is likely if they are interested enough to vote) knows that the vote would be invalid regardless, so there is no need to notify them of this unless they kick up a fuss about it. So why was I notified of this?

Also why was the amount of time on the wiki mentioned, especially when I have been here longer than you DroneDestroyer, by almost 3 months?

Tl;dr version I guess?: I voted because I wanted to show who I picked, nothing more, no attempt of convincing others.

Tallying up votes is not as hard as it seems, with a group working on this or even one person it should be simple to remove 1 or 2 votes (3 so far in this case)

Why was there messages even sent out, no disqualified voters caused a fuss and it does not effect the outcome.

I have been on wiki since merge so time spent on the wiki is invalid.