Thread:Ozziene/@comment-32638135-20170711201211/@comment-5406014-20170711205701

At first, i think it was critically against bmy procedure side but now I think it's a cool idea. After I get an infamy grievance, I will make a new thread named "My infamy grievances", and once it cannot accept more replies, I will make another one. An opening message for an infamy grievance with this algorithm:

==Fame problem in [vn]

[im]

Fame entry:

👎[s=🙅🈲❌]: [m=Dislikes must never be greater than likes, This video is under scrutiny, This video is at unlisting risk]

Likes: [l], Dislikes: [d] <- [f=😐(50%)🙁(40%)😧(30)😩(25)😠(15)😡(10)👿(5)%]
 * Division fame: [l/d]
 * Logarithm fame: [log(l/d)]
 * Approval Rating: [l/(l+d))%]

Please find ways to help prevent any further dislikes and increasse likes beyond [d].
 * Likes remaining to resolve 👎[s]: [ln]
 * Second magnitude risk: [dn]👎
 * Risk: [(ln/dn)%]
 * Video: [vl]


 * vn: Video name
 * vl: Video link
 * l: Likes
 * d: Dislikes
 * s: Infamy severity symbol
 * m: Brief Message
 * im: Indroduction message
 * f: Symbol of approval rating
 * ln: Likes needed to demote severity
 * dn: Dislikes until promotion