Board Thread:Petitions/@comment-28083312-20180322210100/@comment-33623809-20180407024254

Oh boy the peppers are crazy. It all comes down to one question: Quality or quantity?

Seeing as I’m an immature little snitch I would not make this huge post but might as well do it:

I can safely say from my year long FANDOM experience that the tippity-top of ranks in any wiki should be filled with members that (insert drumroll here)

are ....

Full to the brim of initiative (carrying out many projects, have a desire for making the wikia a better place), experience (going through a lot of drama and vandalism and etc. And who cares if that user only joined in mid-July, as long as they’ve seen a lot of stuff), wikia magic (moving pages, all that stuff), active (now here’s the controversial part: we have to consider many factors), and just commitment.

Commitment into helping the wiki into being a better place.

To be honest, quality v quality?

There are many ways into helping a wikia grow into a great place, and both of these seasoned editors have done it. In many different ways and areas. Patrik has (I am quite a stalker, searching the archives of this old wiki) done many article edits and improvements, shaping the wiki to what I’m seeing today. He’s being extremely active, doing this many, many times a day, so cheers to Patrik. He is determined and committed into making the wikia beautiful. Banarama is like an elder, having been on the wikia for years and has seen quite a lot. He’s more social - calming down flamewars and clearing darkness from the forums. Always remember the two main parts of a wiki: Pages and chat. Pages and chat. Content and social life. Remember this when voting.

Banarama - social

Patrik - content

Now it comes down to the problem of activity. To vote, we must first determine the meaning of activity. There are many ways of being “active”, and I think Patrik and Bana demonstrate different ways. Again,

Patrik - content

Banarama - social

Yep. They are both active, according to my opinion. You can be biased about who’s active and who’s not, but this a general (and probably unbiased) statement for everybody.

Welp, that’s it for my useless speech.