Thread:Ursuul/@comment-32368067-20171003185407/@comment-28083312-20171004123049

Ok so I assume we are referring to Thread:136842 Ok so I am confused about what specifically the agreement was. Here is what we have: Ursuul wrote: Alright, you have both won me over on the “No voting” thing. That said, I don’t think there’d be any problem with normal users nominating EotMs, only for Admins to choose who should be picked from among those nominations. That way Editors would have some control, but Admins would ensure fairness. Utkar22 wrote: Agreed. Radium212 wrote: Agreed. I suggest three users (see my previous details <sup style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #000000; cursor: help;" title="Perhaps a collection of near-randomly selected users, (near random being active, fair, and productive diep.io wiki, or maybe DCoW users), with a leading admin or two, who select the candidates for vote. The collection would change every month. Leave a message on the wall of the selected ( with the option to opt-out), and give them some time to select the nominees (they each get one nomination). Then create the thread, and let the voting commence.">ℹ️ of it) choose candidates, then Admins select the winner. Ursuul wrote: That might work… ^That I think is what you were referring to Radium? But then this was said…   TheGoldenPatrik1 wrote: Honestly, I see nothing wrong with the current system. Everyone likes it but not everyone may like a new one. Unless a new system shows definite improvements, I don't think we should do it.  Radium212 wrote: One final (massive) detail. Will we be awarding it for conceptions (hopefully not)? I suggest only awarding it for strictly diep.io based, factual, editing. ''' Ursuul wrote: I don’t have a problem keeping with the old system if that’s what everyone likes, but conception editing has to be taken into account. Fairness needs to be apparent, since conception editors see their edits as valuable. I think if we keep things the way they are now, us Admins will have to take Concept Editing partially into account, in order to be fair. While we might not give out EotM purely for conception edits, we won’t ignore them completely, so in a scenario where two users have both equally contributed to canon spaces, but one has contributed to fanon on top of that, the latter will win EotM. Radium212 wrote: Alright then. Are we all agreed on this system? TheGoldenPatrik1 wrote: Sounds perfect! @ Ursuul I’m in agreement. '''Then after that Utkar tried to get more consideration for Fanon, & we got him down to some number below 50% & I told him that the number he picked was what I intended to use anyway, so I assumed the “general consensus” of that thread was; keep things the same, give Conceptors partial consideration. That’s what I thought the agreement was, I thought the council was overruled. Did I misunderstand what everyone was saying? If I did not, do you want to consider doing the council again anyway?