Board Thread:Petitions/@comment-28083312-20180322210100/@comment-26806340-20180403202139

Projects. It's certainly true that Bana has lead or participated in no small number of projects. But in my time here, I've also initiated (such as Arras.io) and and contributed (including Page Moving, Diep2, and Unknown author) to quite a few projects. Nevertheless, I cannot deny that Bana has lead many more than I have, but in the months that I've been here, I have done just as much of this as Bana has. Certainly true, but your experience is still relatively little — you've hardly even overseen a project through completion. *Long-Standingness. Bana's been on this wiki a long time, almost since it's creation, whereas I've been here a *mere* ten months. But is this really an actual argument? Should we appoint Senior Admins based upon how long they've been here... or upon what they've done while they've been here? And while I haven't been here for eons, I have been on FANDOM since 2014. That's an embarrassingly bad comparison. Have you reformed the staff of an entire wiki multiple times, as I had at first on Mope? Have you been through the Dark Era and risen to the top through skill and experience in hard times? It's a whole other world.
 * Experience. Bana claims to have more experience in virtually every realm—staff management, harassment, and so on. But this is a misunderstanding of the facts. I have considerable experience with Staff management (for example, I almost single-handedly reformed the MooMoo.io Wiki Staff and am responsible for the promotions    ), harassment (having participated in the cleanup of  and Furry-Gate), and vandalism (I've literally reverted hundreds of vandalous edits, both here and across the FANDOM network). If I don't have enough experience to equal Bana, no one does.